Tuesday, 2 February 2010

CATCH THE BUZZ - Transhipped Honey Hurting U.S. Beekeepers

CATCH THE BUZZ

What Transshipped Honey is Doing to the U.S. Honey Market and What You Can Do About It!

 


Protein feeding pays off with better bee health, better survival, better production, and better wintering.  Learn More.

 Find out What’s New At Mann Lake right Here


As beekeepers, honey packers, and importers our challenges seem to grow faster than we can produce honey.  The ever-evolving and complex schemes devised to enter honey into our market without paying the U.S. antidumping duty on Chinese honey imports is mind-boggling, to say the least.  Our attempt in this article is to shed additional light on the subject, so we are better able to fight this very real threat to our future in the bee business. 

1.  U.S. import statistics highlight the honey laundering problem

 

Let’s start with what we know about imports.  USDA Honey Market News data shows the U.S. imported less than 200,000 pound of honey from China in 2009, after being the largest U.S. honey supplier before imposition of the Chinese antidumping duty in December 2001.

 

 Record levels of honey are now being imported into the United States from India, Vietnam, Thailand, Taiwan, Malaysia and Indonesia.  These last three countries do not have commercial beekeeping industries, so these countries do not have the capacity to produce and export 35.5 million pounds of honey to the United States in 2008 or any year.

 The average price of honey from Thailand, Taiwan, Malaysia, and Indonesia is about $0.75 per pound.  Compare this price to the honey from the U.S., Canada, Argentina and Brazil and the reality that it costs about $1 per pound to produce honey normally.  Also curious is the fact white honey is now being shipped to the United States from Vietnam,  which is a country that does not produce white honey

Transshipment of Chinese-origin honey through other countries is not the only problem.  Chinese shippers and others are also misdescribing honey as blended syrup, honey syrup, and malt sweetener to avoid paying the antidumping duty.

n both 2008 and 2009, at least 80 million pounds of Chinese-origin honey entered the United States each year without paying the anti-dumping duty.  This means that uncollected duties totaled $200 million in lost revenues for the U.S. Treasury for this two-year period.

 

In 2008, 35% of all U.S. honey imports entered our market without payment of the antidumping duty.  In 2009, circumvented honey imports grew to 44% of total imports.

 

2.  The impact of transshipments on all honey segments

 

Increasingly sophisticated honey import schemes are creating drastically diverging market prices.  There is now one price for legitimate honey and another rock bottom price (which is sometimes available at ½ the cost of legitimate honey) for transshipped honey.  This trade makes it almost impossible for honey packers who refuse to purchase this transshipped product to compete against those who are engaged in this activity.  Additionally, the unfair competition is detrimental to the legitimate honey importer segment of the honey industry. 

 

Honey laundering undermines the credibility of the entire honey sector, since the image and reputation of honey as a safe and wholesome product is put into question.  Such schemes mean there is greater risk of adulterated honey products being sold as pure honey in the U.S. food chain with increased potential of residues entering the U.S. food supply, since Chinese honey has been found to contain a variety of antibiotics.

 

The honey laundering trade undermines the image and reputation of honey among U.S. consumers.  This illicit trade opens the honey industry to questions of commercial fraud, food safety and security.  Clearly, consumers and food manufacturers are also being cheated as this practice spreads. 

 

3.  Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Attorney Offices are continuing to investigate and charge those who support and participate in illegal activities

 

Commercial fraud is a serious crime of interest to U.S. Attorney Offices across the U.S.  Potential violations of Food and Drug laws on adulteration and misbranding carry stiff penalties on top of embarrassing indictments for those companies that are charged with such misdeeds.  The Department of Homeland Security is continuing to investigate and U.S. Attorney’s are continuing to prosecute those who support illegal honey laundering activities. 

 

n May of 2008, two Chicago executives of a German-based food company (i.e., Alfred L. Wolff) were arrested for allegedly conspiring to illegally import honey from China that was falsely identified as coming from other countries to avoid antidumping duties.  According to the government complaint, the company imported honey into the U.S. valued at almost $30 million since 2005.  U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agents tested samples of honey whose shipping documents indicated they were produced in Russia, and the lab results showed that some of the samples contained honey produced in China.  The complaint noted that when Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents searched the company’s Chicago office, they seized documents that showed the company had sold an adulterated shipment to an unidentified company in the U. S. at a discount rate. 

 

Federal authorities have also pursued other schemes, including the activities of Chinese nationals and importers to defraud the United States with false paperwork used to hide Chinese-origin honey.  On August 19, 2009, Boa Zhong Zhang (a citizen of China) pled guilty in U.S. District Court in Seattle, to “conspiracy to enter goods in the United States, and introduction of adulterated food into interstate commerce.”  Mr. Zhang was a 20-year employee of a bee products company in China, who was arrested on May 6, 2009 in Los Angeles, while traveling in the U.S.

 

Chung Po Liu, an importer from Bellevue, Washington, was also arrested on May 6 and his trial is forthcoming.  According to the complaint filed the case, LIU (through his two companies) is alleged to have purchased honey from China, and then had it shipped to other countries where it was re-labeled to make it appear it was a product of these other countries. 

 

More recently, on October 29, 2009, the U.S. Attorney for Chicago announced that the “president of a honey manufacturer in China” (i.e., Yong Xiang Yan) pled guilty “to conspiring to illegally import Chinese honey.”  Mr. Yan is now awaiting sentencing by the judge in U.S. District Court sometime this spring and faces a maximum financial penalty of $3.9 million and a few years in prison.     

 

4.  Support efforts to rid the honey industry of fraudulent imports

 

t is our duty to help our government officials ensure that imported honey in safe, legal and properly labeled as to country of origin.  Your support of efforts to combat fraudulent Chinese honey import practices could make a difference in our on-going viability as beekeepers.  The adverse affects of this trade on legitimate businesses who ethically source honey will not be stopped without the concerted involvement of us individually and collectively. 

 I

CBP and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) officials have occasionally intercepted containers of questionable honey, but we need these federal agencies to step up their efforts.  In this regard, we ask that you write to your Senators and Representative in Congress about fraudulent honey imports and urge them to press FDA, CBP and ICE officials to enhance their focus on this issue.       

 

To help combat this trade on a transactional basis, we encourage you to report suspicious activity (including the sale of imported honey at dramatically reduced prices) to ICE at 1-866-DHS-2-ICE or at iprcenter@dhs.gov 

CBP should also be contacted to report antidumping or misdescription of goods violations by going online and completing a three-step form at: https://apps.cbp.gov/eallegations/allegations.asp.  To remain anonymous, you can simply ignore step one (which asks for your contact information) and provide information on the alleged violation in step 2 and the alleged violator in step 3.

 

To ensure the integrity of the honey sector, it is critical that you do not buy transshipped honey that is offered to you and report those who attempt to engage you in this activity to ICE and CBP.  ICE and CBP agents continue to closely watch honey shipments, but any additional specific and timely information that you can provide them will aid their investigations and lead to further convictions.

 

Richard Pasco

 

On Behalf of the Honest Honey Initiative

McLeod, Watkinson & Miller

One Massachusetts Avenue, N.W.

Suite 800

Washington, DC 20001


This message brought to you by Bee Culture, The Magazine Of American Beekeeping, published by the A.I. Root Company.

 

Subscribe to Malcolm Sanford’s Apis Newsletter right here For a comprehensive listing of beekeeping events around the country and around the globe, check out Bee Culture’s Global Beekeeping Calendar

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Friday, 29 January 2010

CATCH THE BUZZ - SEEDS SHORT, ORDER EARLY

CATCH THE BUZZ

Will there be a shortage of vegetable seeds for gardeners in 2010?

Source: freep.com


Protein feeding pays off with better bee health, better survival, better production, and better wintering.  Learn More.

 Find out What’s New At Mann Lake right Here


It is possible, says Barbara Melera, owner of the oldest seed house in the country, D. Landreth Seeds of New Freedom, Pa.

"In 2009, we had the worst growing season in 50 years," she said. Rain and disease destroyed crops and with them, the seeds for next year's garden.

"Onion sets. And a cucumber seed shortage," she predicted. "We are being told that the cucumber harvest was catastrophic, attacked late in the season by woolly mildew. There was fruit, but no viable seeds inside.

"We are being told that many, many varieties simply won't be available."

Likewise, Europe had a terrible harvest this year, and Europeans purchased much of their produce from the United States, taking with it, the seeds.

And, as further proof that we are in a global marketplace, Europeans and Australians have taken a fancy to eating sprouts.

"When you grow vegetables just to get the sprouts, nothing gets to fruit. And they are consuming gigantic quantities of seeds just for the purpose of sprouts," Melera said.

Word of possible shortages must be leaking out, Melera said, because retailers are telling her they had their best December in years.

It is certainly true that vegetable gardeners are ordering seeds earlier and earlier, but Melera said she thinks it is more likely that gardeners are acting out of fear of shortages.

This message brought to you by Bee Culture, The Magazine Of American Beekeeping, published by the A.I. Root Company.

Subscribe to Malcolm Sanford’s Apis Newsletter right here For a comprehensive listing of beekeeping events around the country and around the globe, check out Bee Culture’s Global Beekeeping Calendar

 




Thursday, 28 January 2010

CATCH THE BUZZ - African Bees Not An Economic Threat

CATCH THE BUZZ

Killer Bees Aren’t So Bad After All…

by Alan Harman

 

Protein feeding pays off with better bee health, better survival, better production, and better wintering.  Learn More.

 Find out What’s New At Mann Lake right Here

   The researchers at the university’s Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences say while the bees ruined domestic hives and damaged profits in South and Central American when they arrived in 1956, the analysis shows little or no impact on North American honey production.

   Charles Moss, one of the analysts behind the report and a professor in the department of food and resource economics, says a more pressing economic concern for beekeepers is colony collapse disorder.

   Moss says the analysis, published online by the journal of Ecological Economics, seems to indicate virtually no hive loss to the bees and any economic loss was likely due to the cost of preventive measures taken by hive keepers to keep the Africanized bees away.

   “This helps to show that the primary concerns with Africanized honey bees are liability and safety, which are everyone’s concern and aren’t strictly attached to beekeepers,” he says. “Beekeepers already have a much more pressing economic concern from CCD.”

   Moss says the analysis indicates beekeepers have been taking the optimal actions to reduce the effects of Africanized bees – actions such as those widely promoted by state agencies.

   Jamie Ellis of the university’s Honey Bee Research and Extension Laboratory says beekeepers usually change their management styles when Africanized bees are in the area. These steps can reliably keep Africanized bees from overtaking domestic hives.

   “I am not surprised about the lack of effect of Africanized bees on honey production,” he says.

   Ellis, who did not participate in the economic analysis, says certain factors, such as the need to replace queen bees more often, may drive costs up. And some beekeepers may lose money if they choose to leave lucrative bee-removal businesses due to worries about Africanized bee encounters.

   Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services head of apiary inspection Jerry Hayes says he’s worried that a more severe economic impact on beekeepers may come from overzealous zoning of domestic beekeepers due to misguided worries that having domestic bees may attract the Africanized bees.

   “Honey is a byproduct of pollination, which is the most important aspect of managed honey bees,” he says. “If beekeepers are zoned, ordinanced and restricted out of areas because of fear – then it is people putting the strain on the keepers and their ability to produce, not the Africanized bees.”

 

This message brought to you by Bee Culture, The Magazine Of American Beekeeping.

Subscribe to Malcolm Sanford’s Apis Newsletter right here For a comprehensive listing of beekeeping events around the country and around the globe, check out Bee Culture’s Global Beekeeping Calendar

 

 


A University of Florida economic analysis finds Africanized honey bees are not adversely affecting the North American honey industry even after spreading throughout 10 states.

Monday, 25 January 2010

CATCH THE BUZZ- Disaster Program Signup Deadline

CATCH THE BUZZ

Disaster Program Sign-Ups Due January 30


 

Protein feeding pays off with better bee health, better survival, better production, and better wintering.  Learn More.

 Find out What’s New At Mann Lake right Here


Eligible livestock producers have until January 30 to submit applications for eligible livestock grazing losses that occurred due to drought or fire on or after January 1, 2008, and before October 1, 2011, according to the Livestock Forage Disaster Program. Wisconsin Farm Service Agency Director Brad Pfaff says all crops intended for grazing need to have crop insurance coverage or Noninsured Assistance Program coverage for the crop year that the benefits are requested.

"Producers considered limited resource, socially disadvantage or beginning farmers are exempt from the insurance requirement," Pfaff said.
 
The monthly payment rate will be an amount equal to 60 percent of the lesser of the monthly feed cost for all covered livestock, using a feed grain equivalent. The FSA also notes that losses due to drought must occur during the normal grazing period for the specific type of grazing land.

Meanwhile, eligible producers with livestock, forage, honey bees, or farm-raised fish losses due to disease, adverse weather, or other conditions between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2009, will also have until January 30 to submit an application for payment for 2009 losses for the Farm-Raised Fish Program and the Livestock Indemnity Program. Adequate documentation must prove the loss occurred as a direct result of an eligible adverse weather event in the calendar year for which benefits are being requested.

Producers should contact their local FSA county offices with any questions about any of the programs.


This message brought to you by Bee Culture, The Magazine Of American Beekeeping.   

Subscribe to Malcolm Sanford’s Apis Newsletter right here For a comprehensive listing of beekeeping events around the country and around the globe, check out Bee Culture’s Global Beekeeping Calendar

 

Thursday, 21 January 2010

Central Beekeepers Alliance : New Honey Bee Documentaries

Central Beekeepers Alliance : New Honey Bee Documentaries


New Honey Bee Documentaries

Posted: 20 Jan 2010 09:44 AM PST

A program by David Suzuki recently aired on CBC January 7th entitled To Bee or Not to Bee. The documentary explores various possibilities for the declining honeybee population in several countries such as industrial beekeeping, poor nutrition from monoculuture pollinations, and diseases. The topics are similar to another documentary The Vanishing of the Bees. It was released in the UK in October 2009 and is scheduled for US and international theatrical release in March, April and May. At this point the film is being screened at smaller venues in the states and the next showing is in New York in February.  The trailer for the film is available on youtube and you can sign up for mailing list updates on their website and follow release dates near you.bees-vanishing-md

New Honey Bee Documentaries comes from the Central Beekeepers Alliance of New Brunswick, Canada. For more information on Honey Bees and Beekeeping, please: * Visit http://cba.stonehavenlife.com * Subscribe to our RSS feed * Get free updates by e-mail

  • No Related Post

Wednesday, 20 January 2010

CATCH THE BUZZ - Food is back to basics

CATCH THE BUZZ

Honey Fits Right In With Food Channel's Predictions

From Meister Publishing


Protein feeding pays off with better bee health, better survival, better production, and better wintering.  Learn More.

 

Find out What’s New At Mann Lake right Here

 According to the Food Channel’s top 10 list of food trends for 2010, “back to basics” is in, meaning a focus on home-cooked meals made from basic, healthy ingredients.

The Food Channel’s foodies say it “isn’t about retro, or comfort food, or even cost -- it’s about determining the essentials and stocking your pantry accordingly.” They also anticipate consumers will shop more frequently in order to purchase the freshest ingredients while minimizing waste.

Food vetting is another emerging trend, the Food Channel says, including issues like Fair Trade and organics. Sustainability will remain front and center, too, with consumers adopting sustainable practices such as eating locally sourced and seasonal foods, as well as purchasing products in sustainable packaging.

Another trend will be “food with benefits,” meaning functional foods high in nutrients, which ties into another anticipated trend: bartering for consumables. Farmers markets and CSAs will continue to grow in popularity, and the Food Channel analysts even predict food swaps -- eg a box of tomatoes in exchange for babysitting.


 

This message brought to you by Bee Culture, The Magazine Of American Beekeeping. Watch this space, our web page, Brushy Mountain Bee Farm, and thedailygreen.com for registration information on our upcoming webinar on Urban Beekeeping.

  Subscribe to Malcolm Sanford’s Apis Newsletter right here For a comprehensive listing of beekeeping events around the country and around the globe, check out Bee Culture’s Global Beekeeping Calendar

 

 

Tuesday, 19 January 2010

CATCH THE BUZZ - GM Alfalfa On Trial

CATCH THE BUZZ

Monsanto case against alfalfa ban reaches the Supreme Court

By Guy Montague-Jones, Food Production Daily.com
Protein feeding pays off with better bee health, better survival, better production, and better wintering.  Learn More.
Find out What’s New At Mann Lake right Here

The Supreme Court has agreed to review a court order that halted the planting of genetically modified alfalfa made by Monsanto.

Back in 2007, a federal district court order overturned approval from the Department of Agriculture and halted the planting of Roundup Ready alfalfa pending an environmental impact statement (EIS) from the USDA.

USDA report

Monsanto has fought this decision repeatedly in the courts and is now taking the case to the Supreme Court even thought the final EIS report is due for publication next month.

Garrett Kasper, a spokesperson for Monsanto, said the company is continuing the legal battle in order to fight for grower rights and set a legal precedent.

The Center for Food Safety disagrees with this assessment. Andrew Kimbrell, the executive director of the organic lobby group, said Monsanto is pushing the case all the way to the Supreme Court even though the USDA analysis is now complete and the US government has actively opposed further litigation.

This, Kimbrell said: “Underscores the great lengths that Monsanto will go to further its mission of patent control of our food system and selling more pesticides.”

Farmer freedom

Monsanto claims the court case is not about patent control but rather the freedom of growers to choose their products.

Kasper said the court injunction failed to establish that the product posed a “threat of irreparable damage,” which he said was necessary to justify a temporary ban.

Citing a case against US Navy about alleged damage to marine life from sonar, the company spokesperson said the Supreme Court has overruled court similar injunctions in the past.

But the Center for Food Safety is confident that the Supreme Court will uphold earlier opinions. “Although we believe a further hearing is unnecessary, we are confident we will again prevail, as the lower courts have already three times determined.”

Irrespective of the outcome, whether planting Roundup Ready alfalfa will eventually be permitted depends most crucially on the conclusions reached in the EIS. Kasper said Monsanto is encouraged by the draft report, which he described as being “pretty favourable.”

The final report is due for publication in February before a court decides on whether the ban on biotech alfalfa should be maintained.

Alfalfa is the fourth most commonly grown crop in the US, and according to Monsanto, 1 percent is currently Roundup Ready alfalfa. Under the 2007 court injunction farmers already using the GM crop were permitted to continue but any further planting was halted.

This message brought to you by Bee Culture, The Magazine Of American Beekeeping. .

 Subscribe to Malcolm Sanford’s Apis Newsletter right here For a comprehensive listing of beekeeping events around the country and around the globe, check out Bee Culture’s Global Beekeeping Calendar